Skip to content

ModelsAnthropic

Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2: Anthropic's new flagship tops the AI Intelligence Index at $8 per million input tokens

Claude Fable 5.2 at a glance

Anthropic released Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 on November 9, 2026. As of November 9, 2026, Fable 5.2 ranks #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 at max effort). It costs $8 per million input tokens and $40 output, with a fast mode at $16/$80.

Current standing

As of

Rank
#1of 45 models

Claude Fable 5.2 (Max) · 64.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 (opens in a new tab)

Recorded at publication
64.6 (v5.0.1)

as of

Current leader
Still the top model in this snapshot.

Computed from our daily snapshot; it changes as new models are measured. Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2: Anthropic's new flagship tops the AI Intelligence Index at $8 per million input tokens

What changed with Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic released Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2 on November 9, 2026, upgrading the models it builds for the most daunting technical challenges. The two are the same underlying model: Fable 5.2 is the public version, with strong cybersecurity and biology safeguards, while Mythos 5.2 drops some of those safeguards for vetted organizations in Anthropic's Cyber and Life Sciences Verification Programs. Fable 5.2 is available today on the Claude Platform as claude-fable-5-2, on Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure, and in Claude subscriptions. Anthropic says the new models communicate more clearly than Fable 5.1 and generate outputs up to 30% faster.

Anthropic chart: overall misaligned behavior scores in the automated behavioral audit of about 1,900 scenarios (lower is better). Claude Mythos 5.2 scores 2.67, the lowest, then Claude Opus 5.5 at 2.79, Claude Sonnet 5.5 at 3.10 and Claude Mythos 5.1 at 3.28.
Official imageImage: Anthropic (opens in a new tab)

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Claude Fable 5.2 at max effort scores 64.6, which as of November 9, 2026 ranks it #1 of the 59 model families Artificial Analysis scores, ahead of Google's Gemini 4 Carbon at 60.0 and Claude Opus 5.5 at 59.1. Its lower effort settings stay near the top: 62.2 at xhigh, 61.8 at high, 56.4 at medium and 53.9 at low. In Anthropic's own benchmark table, Fable 5.2 leads Opus 5.5 on FrontierCode 2.0 agentic coding (49.1% at xhigh against 45.5%), Humanity's Last Exam with tools (74.2% against 67.7%) and OSWorld 2.1 computer use (89.3% against 87.2%). It does not win everything: Gemini 4 Carbon beats it on AutomationBench business workflows (53.9% against 51.4%).

Anthropic bar chart: RoboDojo Sim average success rates controlling a simulated two-arm robot, at max effort. Claude Fable 5.2 scores 64.9%, more than double GPT-6 Astra (29.8%) and Fable 5.1 (27.6%), and ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 (39.4%) and Gemini 4 Argon (34.2%).
Official imageImage: Anthropic (opens in a new tab)

Fable 5.2 costs $8 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens, down from Fable 5.1's $10 and $50, and an optional fast mode speeds up token generation by up to 2.5 times at $16 and $80. Running the full Artificial Analysis index costs $22,191 at max effort, $7,106 at high and $3,360 at medium, so the effort setting is the main cost control: Anthropic's docs set high as the API default, medium is the default in Claude apps and Claude Code, and adaptive thinking is always on. In Anthropic's testing, Fable 5.2 at high effort scored about level with Opus 5.5 at max effort on FrontierCode 2.0, for roughly half the cost per task.

Anthropic's prerelease stories are unusually concrete. A team of agents running an early Fable 5.2 migrated a critical production service from Python to Rust, and the service now starts about 26 times faster. One engineer had Fable 5.2 design a prototype operating system from an empty folder, coordinating over 1,000 subagents for eight days to produce a working OS that boots on a laptop. A thousand Fable 5.2 agents formalized the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in 30 hours, where Opus 5.5 with the same setup completed 26% in the same time. Fable 5.2 also solved two open problems in black-hole physics, designed three working electronic devices with circuit-board maker Diode, and helped predict whole virus capsid structures for gene therapy.

Anthropic chart: formalizing the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in Lean over 30 hours with about 1,000 agents. Claude Fable 5.2 (green line) completes the full proof (1.00); Claude Opus 5.5 (orange line) reaches 0.27.
Official imageImage: Anthropic (opens in a new tab)

For cybersecurity, Anthropic calls Mythos 5.2 its most capable model yet: it scored 89.6% on its internal CVE Rediscovery evaluation, finding 10.2% more vulnerabilities than Opus 5.5, and one security company said one in six confirmed bugs Mythos 5.2 found had been missed by every other frontier model it tested. Fable 5.2's safeguards produce about 55% fewer unnecessary blocks than Fable 5.1's, blocked queries fall back to Opus models, and Anthropic says its anti-distillation protections are its strongest ever, cutting the data harvested by distillers by 90% to 99%. In a dedicated sandbox-escape evaluation, Mythos 5.2 used planted credentials in 3.1% of scenarios, down from 39% for Mythos 5. External evaluators included the UK AI Security Institute and METR.

Claude Fable 5.2 benchmarks and pricing

Values are copied from the linked source on the date shown. They are not IA Compa measurements.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexas of · Source for Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: artificialanalysis.ai (opens in a new tab)
64.6 (v5.0.1)
FrontierCode 2.0 agentic coding (Anthropic, xhigh effort)as of · Source for FrontierCode 2.0 agentic coding (Anthropic, xhigh effort): anthropic.com (opens in a new tab)
49.1%
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (Anthropic)as of · Source for Humanity's Last Exam with tools (Anthropic): anthropic.com (opens in a new tab)
74.2%
CVE Rediscovery, internal evaluation (Anthropic) · Claude Mythos 5.2as of · Source for CVE Rediscovery, internal evaluation (Anthropic): anthropic.com (opens in a new tab)
89.6%

How it compares

Current models we have covered: released in the last six months, newest version of each line only. Each value is the model's latest recorded value. (Models)

Intelligence index · Claude Fable 5.2higher is better
Input price (USD per 1M tokens) · Claude Fable 5.2lower is better
Output price (USD per 1M tokens) · Claude Fable 5.2lower is better
Context window (tokens) · Claude Fable 5.2higher is better

Claude Fable 5.2 reasoning effort

Artificial Analysis tests this model at several reasoning-effort settings. Higher effort usually scores higher but costs more and answers more slowly.

Claude Fable 5.2 by effort level

Higher effort lets the model think longer. Here is what each setting scores, how fast it writes, and what it costs on Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index · higher is better
Cost to run the index · lower is betterHover, tap or focus a point for exact numbers.
Claude Fable 5.2: Artificial Analysis results by reasoning effort
EffortIntelligence IndexOutput speed (tokens per second)Cost to run the indexBlended price (3:1) (per 1M tokens)Price in / out (per 1M tokens)First token
Max (Claude Fable 5.2 (max)) · Best: highest effort with a score, used in the leaderboard65n/a$22,191$16$8 / $40n/a
Extra high (Claude Fable 5.2 (xhigh))62n/a$11,742$16$8 / $40n/a
High (Claude Fable 5.2 (high))62n/a$7,106$16$8 / $40n/a
Medium (Claude Fable 5.2 (medium))56n/a$3,360$16$8 / $40n/a
Low (Claude Fable 5.2 (low))54n/a$2,862$16$8 / $40n/a
Price: $8 / $40 per 1M input / output tokens at every effort.Artificial Analysis · as of Nov 9, 2026 (opens in a new tab)

Where to compare Claude Fable 5.2

Independent leaderboards and official resources for comparing this model yourself. Rankings change often; each site shows its own current data.

Why Claude Fable 5.2 matters for businesses

Why it matters: the top of the AI market just moved. Fable 5.2 is the model to beat on independent intelligence rankings as of November 9, 2026, it undercuts its predecessor's price, and Anthropic positions it as the hard-problem tier above Opus 5.5, which it still recommends as the daily driver. Fable 5.2 can also act as an advisor that smaller models consult, or as an orchestrator that delegates work to them. For agencies and teams running agentic coding or research workflows, the practical question is now effort budgeting: high effort delivers near-max quality at about a third of the max-effort cost. Launch week brings subscribers extra Fable resets, with Fable counting for up to 50% of weekly usage limits on Pro plans and Team standard seats.

Get AI News by email

Verified AI stories, each with its official source, on Monday and Thursday mornings. Add breaking news to hear about the biggest ones as soon as we publish them.

Every story links its official source

Free, in English or Spanish

Unsubscribe with one click, any time

What to send

Sources for this story

  1. Official
  2. Official

Last verified: . IA Compa summarizes public announcements for business readers. We are not affiliated with the companies mentioned. Always confirm details, pricing, and availability with the official source.

  • #llm
  • #anthropic
  • #claude
  • #claude-fable-5-2
  • #mythos-5-2
  • #frontier-model
  • #coding
  • #cybersecurity

Want this working in your business?

We turn new AI capabilities into agents, voice receptionists, and automations you can actually use.