Skip to content

ModelsMeta

Meta Muse Ember: smallest, cheapest Muse model for AI agents at $0.10 per million input tokens

Muse Ember at a glance

Meta released Muse Ember on November 9, 2026: its smallest, cheapest model, built for the tool calls, coding subtasks and document work AI agents repeat all day. It ties Claude Haiku 5.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at a third of the cost.

Current standing

As of

Rank
#16of 45 models

Muse Ember (Max) · 36 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 (opens in a new tab)

Recorded at publication
36 (v5.0.1)

as of

Current leader
Claude Fable 5.2 (Anthropic) · 64.6

Computed from our daily snapshot; it changes as new models are measured. Meta Muse Ember: smallest, cheapest Muse model for AI agents at $0.10 per million input tokens

What changed with Muse Ember

Meta Superintelligence Labs released Muse Ember on November 9, 2026, its smallest and most efficient model, designed for complex reasoning execution and the work agents repeat all day: tool calls, coding subtasks, routing, extraction, and long document parsing. It is available today on Muse Code and the Meta Model API as muse-ember-1.0, supports the Responses API, and natively understands text, images, audio, and video. Ember is the first model Meta trained using Muse Wonder Full, and Meta pitches the pairing directly: Muse Wonder plans, Muse Ember handles the volume.

On Artificial Analysis benchmarks dated November 9, 2026, Muse Ember at max reasoning scores 36 on the Intelligence Index, matching Claude Haiku 5.5 at max and ahead of GPT-6 Luna at max with 28. Ember leads both rivals on AutomationBench-AA end-to-end business workflows (37.8 against 13.9 and 20.2), Agents' Last Exam (61.6 against 57.0 and 57.1), and Terminal-Bench 4.0 agentic coding (40.9 against 39.2 and 16.4). Meta puts Ember's cost at about $0.14 per Artificial Analysis task, against $2.39 for Muse Spark 1.3, which scores 37 on the same index.

Ember costs $0.10 per million input tokens, $0.004 per million cached input tokens, and $0.50 per million output tokens, with a 1M-token context window and up to 512K output tokens, so it can take in a full codebase or document set in one call. Its reasoning_effort setting runs from minimal to max, and Meta evaluated it before release under its Superintelligence Scaling Framework, finding it below the high-risk thresholds in every category assessed. Early partner Box uses it to score contracts against negotiation playbooks and to screen candidates against detailed briefs.

Muse Ember benchmarks and pricing

Values are copied from the linked source on the date shown. They are not IA Compa measurements.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexas of · Source for Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: artificialanalysis.ai (opens in a new tab)
36 (v5.0.1)
AutomationBench-AA (end-to-end business workflows)as of · Source for AutomationBench-AA (end-to-end business workflows): research.meta.ai (opens in a new tab)
37.8
Cost per Artificial Analysis taskas of · Source for Cost per Artificial Analysis task: research.meta.ai (opens in a new tab)
$0.14

How it compares

Current models we have covered: released in the last six months, newest version of each line only. Each value is the model's latest recorded value. (Models)

Intelligence indexhigher is better
Input price (USD per 1M tokens)lower is better
Output price (USD per 1M tokens)lower is better
Context window (tokens)higher is better

Muse Ember reasoning effort

Artificial Analysis tests this model at several reasoning-effort settings. Higher effort usually scores higher but costs more and answers more slowly.

Muse Ember by effort level

Higher effort lets the model think longer. Here is what each setting scores, how fast it writes, and what it costs on Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index · higher is better
Cost to run the index · lower is betterHover, tap or focus a point for exact numbers.
Muse Ember: Artificial Analysis results by reasoning effort
EffortIntelligence IndexOutput speed (tokens per second)Cost to run the indexBlended price (3:1) (per 1M tokens)Price in / out (per 1M tokens)First token
Max (Muse Ember (max)) · Best: highest effort with a score, used in the leaderboard36n/a$117$0.073$0.10 / $0.50n/a
Extra high (Muse Ember (xhigh))34n/a$95.73$0.073$0.10 / $0.50n/a
Price: $0.10 / $0.50 per 1M input / output tokens at every effort.Artificial Analysis · as of Nov 9, 2026 (opens in a new tab)

Benchmarked by AA: max · xhigh of 6 available

Where to compare Muse Ember

Independent leaderboards and official resources for comparing this model yourself. Rankings change often; each site shows its own current data.

Why Muse Ember matters for businesses

Why it matters: most of an agent's token bill is small, repetitive steps, and Ember prices that volume at roughly a third of the Haiku and Luna tier while matching their intelligence scores. For agencies and businesses running always-on voice and chat agents, the cheap execution tier just got much cheaper, and pairing a frontier planner with a low-cost worker is now a first-party Meta pattern rather than a workaround.

Get AI News by email

Verified AI stories, each with its official source, on Monday and Thursday mornings. Add breaking news to hear about the biggest ones as soon as we publish them.

Every story links its official source

Free, in English or Spanish

Unsubscribe with one click, any time

What to send

Sources for this story

  1. Official
  2. Official

Last verified: . IA Compa summarizes public announcements for business readers. We are not affiliated with the companies mentioned. Always confirm details, pricing, and availability with the official source.

  • #llm
  • #meta
  • #muse
  • #muse-ember
  • #agents
  • #model-pricing

Want this working in your business?

We turn new AI capabilities into agents, voice receptionists, and automations you can actually use.